Sales capability gaps are bad news for business. And by the time they surface, be it through lost deals or sales cycles stretching out longer than they should, the damage to revenue or reputation is usually done.
It might be that product knowledge is out of date, confidence wobbles at the wrong moment, negotiation skills were never quite honed, or discovery calls stay surface-level. Whatever the cause (or, in some cases, a combination of causes), pinning it down is hard, as it often means combing through call after call to see exactly where things go wrong.
Thankfully, there’s an easier way to spot these gaps and, more importantly, solve them before they eat away at your revenue. Here’s how to find out what’s holding your team back and what to do about it.
👉 Related reading: The hidden capability gaps in your new manager pipeline
What is a sales capability gap?
A sales capability gap is the difference between the skills, knowledge, behaviours, and attitude your reps have now and what they need to hit targets and perform at their best.
An example of this in practice is an SDR who builds rapport easily but loses control of the conversation when a prospect asks how your product compares with a competitor’s. This is a capability gap, stemming predominantly from a lack of knowledge and confidence. To close it, their manager could pair competitor-focused product training with practice handling comparison questions, so they’re better equipped for future calls.
Is a sales skill gap different to a sales capability gap?
Yes, though the terms are often used interchangeably. Capability is the broader term, and skills gaps sit within it. A skills gap is a capability gap, but capability covers more ground, including knowledge, behaviours, and attitude. Here’s what each looks like in a sales team:
- Skills: what reps can do, such as running a discovery call, handling objections, negotiating terms, or presenting a proposal
- Knowledge: what reps know, from product and pricing to competitors, market trends, and their buyers’ world
- Behaviours: what reps consistently do in practice, like prepping for calls, agreeing next steps, following up, and keeping the CRM current
- Attitudes: how reps approach the job and respond to setbacks, including confidence discussing price and resilience after a lost deal
👉 More from OL: How to build an upskilling strategy
Red flags that indicate sales capability gaps
Sales capability gaps shouldn’t be underestimated. They can slowly chip away at your results, and the longer they go unaddressed, the more it costs you. The best way to limit the damage is to spot them early, or better still, before they become a problem.
The red flags below can point to capability gaps within your team. However, by the time they show up, a gap is already affecting performance, so treat them as a prompt to look closer rather than the only sign your team has development needs:
- Consistently missed targets or lost deals: results miss the forecast or quota, particularly when the pipeline looks healthy.
- Declining customer retention: more customers are leaving or not renewing than expected.
- Conversion drops at a specific pipeline stage: deals progress well, then stop at the same point time after time.
- Losing to competitors you should beat: reps often struggle to position your offer against the alternatives.
- Lengthening sales cycles: deals take longer to close than they used to, or than your benchmark.
- Heavy discounting: price is dropped early to keep a deal moving.
- High staff turnover: reps who struggle to hit targets or feel unsupported are more likely to leave.
How to find capability gaps in sales teams
Identifying what you need to fix is the obvious first step in addressing capability gaps but, as is often the case with any learning needs analysis, it’s far easier said than done.
The most reliable approach is to measure capability directly, by looking at how people really perform in their day-to-day work. Here are the key steps to help you do that:
1. Define what ‘good’ is
Start with a simple competency map covering the skills, knowledge, behaviours, and attitudes needed for optimal performance in your sales roles. This is your benchmark for everything that follows, so keep it specific.
2. Gather evidence of where you’re at now
Once you know what good looks like, assess where your team currently stands against it. There are many ways to gather this data, but for sales conversations the most accurate tend to draw on real situations, or scenarios that closely mimic them. That gets you closer to what reps really do rather than what they say they do and helps limit the social desirability bias that can creep into self-assessment surveys and interviews.
Data and real calls
Pipeline conversion and activity data show where deals leak, while call recordings and deal reviews add context behind the numbers. AI-powered conversation intelligence tools can also help by transcribing calls and surfacing patterns such as talk-to-listen ratio, common objections, or whether next steps were agreed.
These tools can be useful, but they are still analysing live sales activity after it has happened. They can show where issues may be appearing in real conversations, but they do not always give teams a safe way to test capability before it affects a deal.
Business simulations
Reviewing call data in detail can give you a useful picture of where things are going wrong, but it’s time-consuming and often isn’t feasible for a busy sales lead. An easier way to analyse capability gaps is to have reps work through realistic challenges in a safe space where nothing is at stake.
Business simulations – tailored scenarios that mimic real workplace challenges – work best when built around your own products, buyers, sales process, and the objections your team hears every week.
During simulations, reps are observed making the kinds of decisions they face day to day, such as responding to a client email pushing back on price, or working through a tricky negotiation call. They’re then evaluated against your benchmark, highlighting gaps at both team and individual level and giving you a clear view of where to improve.
👉 Related: Should simulations be part of your L&D strategy? Here’s the business case
Whichever methods you use, include your seasoned reps as well as newer starters. It’s easy to assume experience brings good performance with it, and often it does, but gaps can appear at every tenure.
3. Compare against your benchmark
Set what you’ve found against your competency map. For each competency, look at the distance between where your reps are now and where they need to be. This gives you a clear picture of what needs to change and who needs support.
The most important part: building a development plan
Pinpointing your team’s capability gaps is a useful exercise, but the true value comes from acting on your findings to turn insight into better performance.
1. Build a gap profile for each rep
Map your findings to each person across skills, knowledge, behaviours, and attitudes. Then sort the gaps into shared ones, where most of the team or department struggles, and individual ones, which sit with one person or a few. A shared gap can usually be fixed for the whole team at once, whereas an individual gap needs a more tailored approach.
2. Prioritise
Rank gaps by how much revenue they put at risk and how many people they affect. A habit that erodes margin on every deal, like discounting at the first sign of pushback, should come before a gap that’s irritating but low impact.
3. Deploy the right learning solution for each gap
Now comes the important part: the learning itself. This should be designed as part of your wider L&D strategy, by a learning expert who can match the right methods to each gap and make sure the programme drives behaviour change.
The specifics of your learning programme will depend on your gap analysis, but your solutions might include:
- Manager coaching
- Microlearning modules
- eLearning courses
- Instructor-led workshops
- Peer learning and communities of practice
- Shadowing top performers
- Mentoring
- Practice through realistic scenarios
Some gaps will call for a blended approach. For example, if reps discount at the first sign of pushback, a workshop on selling value could build the knowledge, followed by manager coaching and practice in realistic scenarios to turn it into habit.
4. Measure and review
Agree a development target and timeframe for each person, and decide how you’ll measure progress, such as the share of calls that end with an agreed next step, or average discount levels. This keeps things focused and gives you a tangible way to track progress.
Check in regularly and, after around 60 days, reassess to see whether behaviour has changed. If you used a business simulation, re-running it and comparing results is a good way to mark the impact.
If behaviour has changed, move on to the next priority. If not, look again at whether the method fits the gap, or whether something outside training is getting in the way.
Find capability gaps in your sales team
OL Business Simulations help you spot the gaps in your team and, more importantly, come with a bespoke action plan designed by our expert learning consultants. Get in touch to see how we could help improve your sales team’s performance.
👉 Read next: How to develop an onboarding strategy
